in reply to TK::ProgressBar and update memory build up

I tested your code on my Linux box (Debian Sarge Etch) and I detected the same problem: about 40 KByte of overhead every click.

Rule One: "Do not act incautiously when confronting a little bald wrinkly smiling man."

  • Comment on Re: TK::ProgressBar and update memory build up

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: TK::ProgressBar and update memory build up
by saskak (Novice) on Jun 24, 2008 at 18:14 UTC
    10x, the problem is when using the ProgressBar in more complicated application and the build up is much more. It just eats memory. Maybe I should build my own progressbar and see whether it will help.