Re: our $AUTHORITY

in reply to our $AUTHORITY

Yes, stvn is a madman.

Oh, and yes, AUTHORITY will be used in future versions of CPAN and definitely in C6PAN.

My criteria for good software:

Does it work?
Can someone else come in, make a change, and be reasonably certain no bugs were introduced?

Comment on Re: our $AUTHORITY

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: our $AUTHORITY by Anonymous Monk on Jun 28, 2008 at 08:11 UTC
I don't think we've settled on C6PAN , as opposed to CP6AN?	[reply]
Re^3: our $AUTHORITY by dragonchild (Archbishop) on Jun 28, 2008 at 18:53 UTC
I thought we had settled that I can't type. My criteria for good software: Does it work? Can someone else come in, make a change, and be reasonably certain no bugs were introduced?	[reply]
Re^4: our $AUTHORITY by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Jun 28, 2008 at 19:32 UTC
You've just loosely typed.	[reply]
Re^3: our $AUTHORITY by ambrus (Abbot) on Jun 30, 2008 at 08:47 UTC
Yeah, I like the name CP6AN.	[reply]
Re^4: our $AUTHORITY by parv (Parson) on Jun 30, 2008 at 08:54 UTC
On the face of it, "CP6AN" seemed hard to pronounce first time I read in this thread. Now I propose "C-P-Sexan", or that is my version anyway.	[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom