in reply to Burrows-Wheeler transform

Unless you're trying to golf, you should strive to make it more readable, not shorter.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Burrows-Wheeler transform
by shi (Novice) on Jul 01, 2008 at 18:18 UTC
    You're right, but I was actually making also a try at golf.
    -- 
    @_=(115,-17,6);print+map{chr$_[$.=$_-$_]*$_**$.+++$_[$.]*$_**$.+++$_[$.]*$_**$.}$.-$...$#_