Re: On quoting the lhs of '=>'

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: On quoting the lhs of '=>' by rovf (Priest) on Jul 10, 2008 at 08:21 UTC
Your test code defines the constant BIRD differently from the code you initially ask about; perhaps that explains the difference in behavior? Thank you for pointing this out, but unfortunately it does not. The mistake was done when I edited the posting after having pasted the test code. Here is the original testcode - if you try it out, you will see that it shows the behaviour I was talking about in my post. `use strict; use warnings; use Data::Dumper; use constant { BIRD => 'footchicken' }; print Dumper(+{ +BIRD => 'Valery' });` [download] In my original posting, I used "=" instead of "=>" in one place (I have this corrected now). This code, as posted here, wouldn't even have compiled. -- Ronald Fischer <ynnor@mm.st>	[reply] [d/l]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^2: On quoting the lhs of '=>'
by rovf (Priest) on Jul 10, 2008 at 08:21 UTC

Your test code defines the constant BIRD differently from the code you initially ask about; perhaps that explains the difference in behavior?

Thank you for pointing this out, but unfortunately it does not. The mistake was done when I edited the posting after having pasted the test code. Here is the original testcode - if you try it out, you will see that it shows the behaviour I was talking about in my post.

use strict;
use warnings;
use Data::Dumper;
use constant { BIRD => 'footchicken' };
print Dumper(+{ +BIRD => 'Valery' });
[download]

--
Ronald Fischer <ynnor@mm.st>

[reply]
[d/l]