in reply to Re: Penance Highlighting?
in thread Penance Highlighting?

I don't like the idea of categories because they legitimize noise. Plenty of times, I've thought of one wise-ass remark or another, and I've not written it because I know very well it's a lousy contribution to a discussion. I might not have been so discrete, however, if I'd had the shelter of labeling it 'humor', and I think the site would have suffered for it.

Of course, I've gone ahead and posted some of my wise-ass remarks also. It sounds good to have those labeled, but I think I'd rather have less unlabeled noise than more noise—but with labels.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Penance Highlighting?
by ruzam (Curate) on Jul 10, 2008 at 19:17 UTC
    Ah, but if it's labeled, and you have the means to adjust your preferences to filter it, then your noise level actually drops, despite the encouragement to add more noise by others.

    I've spewed my milk at the monitor on occasion thanks to a good piece of irrelevant humor here. It can be a welcome addition to a slow day :) But there are also times when I just want to cut through the noise and get straight to the point. Having categories and the option to filter based on them would help this I think.