Re^4: [OT] Why I don't use Mysql for new projects

I think you overestimate how much Sun controls MySQL. They have not made anything closed-source, and the stories that they were considering it a couple months ago were quite misleading. I think you're overestimating this in general actually. PHP is certainly not controlled by a company, and Fedora is a very open project.

Would it be any better if the top contributors to Postgres left the project than if the MySQL ones did? Unless you have some data showing that one project has a much more centralized group of contributors, I don't think you can draw any conclusions based on who makes money from it.

Comment on Re^4: [OT] Why I don't use Mysql for new projects

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: [OT] Why I don't use Mysql for new projects by Mutant (Priest) on Jul 10, 2008 at 19:45 UTC
Unless you have some data showing that one project has a much more centralized group of contributors, I don't think you can draw any conclusions based on who makes money from it. I'm not talking about empirical evidence that conclusively proves something. I'm just talking about a personal preference. I prefer to use OSS projects that are set up in that way, and it's worked for me so far. If something else works for you, then great.	[reply]
Re^5: [OT] Why I don't use Mysql for new projects by doom (Deacon) on Jul 10, 2008 at 23:14 UTC
I think you overestimate how much Sun controls MySQL. Doesn't Oracle own the innodb code? That strikes me as far more worrying than the Sun aquisition.	[reply]
Re^6: [OT] Why I don't use Mysql for new projects by perrin (Chancellor) on Jul 11, 2008 at 00:19 UTC
It's open source, just like the rest of MySQL, and Oracle has done nothing to threaten that. Notice how Oracle bought BerkeleyDB and has done nothing to harm it either.	[reply]