Re^4: What will scientific computing in Perl 6 look like?

Don't you need to use the multi keyword on those subs?

Comment on Re^4: What will scientific computing in Perl 6 look like? Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: What will scientific computing in Perl 6 look like? by moritz (Cardinal) on Jul 15, 2008 at 07:53 UTC
It's better style, but if the prelude defines a `proto infix:<+>` (and I'm quite sure it does) it's redundant. Good catch anyway.	[reply] [d/l]
Re^6: What will scientific computing in Perl 6 look like? by John M. Dlugosz (Monsignor) on Jul 15, 2008 at 22:26 UTC
Ah yes, I remember that now. One motivation behind `proto` was that, so existing code included after it would not cause conflicts but become multis (and the proto standardizes the argument matching).	[reply] [d/l]