in reply to Re^5: Dynamic tab creation/destuction with Tk::Notebook
in thread Dynamic tab creation/destuction with Tk::Notebook

This node falls below the community's minimum standard of quality and will not be displayed.
  • Comment on Re^6: Dynamic tab creation/destuction with Tk::Notebook

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^7: Dynamic tab creation/destuction with Tk::Notebook
by GrandFather (Saint) on Jul 16, 2008 at 11:25 UTC

    Do not confuse "could not" with "would not".

    moritz has addressed why we recommend strictures and refrain from answering questions where their lack is evident. We are not setting out to be nasty to you, nor are we really avoiding your questions. We do however like our advice to be listened to and for you to try the simple things we recommend first to fix your own problems and to take a little effort to present your problem concisely.


    Perl is environmentally friendly - it saves trees
Re^7: Dynamic tab creation/destuction with Tk::Notebook
by Anonymous Monk on Jul 16, 2008 at 10:59 UTC
    And yet the guy above answered quite easily what you could not?

    This is the guy, and it definitely wasn't easy as it took about half an hour.

Re^7: Dynamic tab creation/destuction with Tk::Notebook
by blazar (Canon) on Jul 16, 2008 at 16:42 UTC
    And yet the guy above answered quite easily what you could not? Perhaps THAT'S a clue?

    I personally believe that you can't infer how easily did "the guy above" interpret correctly your question. Now, the fact that this very question is by experimental evidence harder to interpret and answer than most are (despite not being technically anything esoteric) may be a clue that it's not asked the best way. Perhaps had you reduced the noise/signal ratio as repeatedly asked, even the person you're replying to may have answered quite easily. In fact his posting history shows that that's generally the case.

    --
    If you can't understand the incipit, then please check the IPB Campaign.