in reply to Re^5: Please review my OSCON presentation
in thread Please review my OSCON presentation

I actually always had that. I just made it several slides.

I also disagree on which solution is best. I've seen multiple programmers try to implement that function and mess it up. There are a number of subtle requirements you have to get right, and I don't think there is any clearer presentation of how to get them right than to show code. I'm not concerned about the common case being wrong. I'm concerned about the production hook going missing, programmers doing the random assignment as $person_id % 2, and other similar mistakes.

I'm leaving the pictures in. I've asked a number of people for feedback, and the consensus of most of them is that the current pictures work well. While I agree that they can be a distraction for someone who is getting lost, I have points where people can resynchronize. And the talk has multiple audiences within any organization, I expect people to lose interest when I'm presenting about stuff they are not interested in. I'd like them to remain somewhat entertained, and then I'd like to get their attention when we move on to a section they care about.

  • Comment on Re^6: Please review my OSCON presentation

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^7: Please review my OSCON presentation
by jethro (Monsignor) on Jul 19, 2008 at 01:29 UTC
    If the presentation should have the double function of providing a manual later on, then you are correct. So you sacrifice a little clarity at the presentation for better value later. For the presentation alone a picture/diagram would still be better

    About the pictures: Good point about the resynchronization. But I think the distraction is no danger for people already lost. It is a danger for tired listeners, for listeners where the coffee is wearing off, for everyone after the one hour mark into the presentation. On the other hand your point about keeping the ones with lost interest entertained is in these circumstances very seductive. Can't argue against that.