Re: Circular dependencies when using the perl syntax checker

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Circular dependencies when using the perl syntax checker by Bloodnok (Vicar) on Jul 29, 2008 at 11:54 UTC
2. Supress warnings (no warnings ... ) As John Macenroe once famously said @ Wimbledon 'You cannot be serious' ... this should only be done by those who know what they're doing and with great care - don't look gift horses etc. etc. To ignore a problem doesn't fix it. `use`ing `strict` & `warnings` are provided for a purpose!! Wonders why aren't they aren't both used by default - being disabled as required ??? At last, a user level that overstates my experience :-))	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^3: Circular dependencies when using the perl syntax checker by Anonymous Monk on Jul 29, 2008 at 12:07 UTC
`use`ing `strict` & `warnings` are provided for a purpose!! Yes, so is `no warnings 'redefine';`	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^4: Circular dependencies when using the perl syntax checker by ikegami (Patriarch) on Jul 29, 2008 at 19:17 UTC
Yes, but it should only be used when intentionally redefining a sub. This isn't the case here. Burying an error doesn't remove it.	[reply]