Re: Understanding Naive Bayesian classifiers

I don't think you're supposed to examine single words, because its the combination of words that determines spam

Comment on Re: Understanding Naive Bayesian classifiers

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Understanding Naive Bayesian classifiers by apl (Monsignor) on Aug 03, 2008 at 14:05 UTC
I'm not so certain I agree. A piece of e-mail from a previously unknown source containing "Viagra", "sexual", "nude", "imitation" or "prize" might automatically make me think it was spam...	[reply]