in reply to use Ensure -- module to spot undefined stuff

Perhaps I'm going it alone, but ... Please post the sources here. I dislike "source code" nodes with no sources. (Ooops, wrong reply button.) UPDATE: Indeed. I'd even accept a link to the cpan sources, but the way it's presented above, I expect link-rot to take it down after a year or two.

-Paul

  • Comment on Re: use Ensure -- module to spot undefined stuff

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: use Ensure -- module to spot undefined stuff
by alexm (Chaplain) on Aug 06, 2008 at 15:29 UTC

    I agree. Plus, why not uploading it to CPAN?

      I didn't think 750 lines of module (with POD) would be welcomed as part of a posting.... so I posted a URL.

      Uploading to CPAN requires a little more effort.

      I've done a first pass of the documentation, which I hope is enough for the module to be usable.

      If it is thought to be useful, then I'll do the rest of the work necessary for a CPAN upload. (If it's not useful then URL decay will do it's work -- natural-selection-wise.)

        If it is thought to be useful, then I'll do the rest of the work necessary for a CPAN upload.

        You've already done much of the necessary work for a CPAN module, except for a few tests maybe (but you can add them anytime). Just upload it and let people decide if it's useful or not. At least, that's more or less what brian_d_foy told us in his recent visit to Barcelona Perl Mongers. Besides, being in CPAN will make your module easier to find.

        Code (including POD) are welcomed as part of a posting especially in the section you've posted in, as long as the post doesn't exceed 64Kb. Yours is only about 24Kb, so please post it here.