in reply to Re: Defining a function in the caller's package
in thread Defining a function in the caller's package

Is there some reason that doesn't fit? (Probably because it would use the master namespace, now that I think about it.)

Exactly for this reason. BTW, I like your suggestion using do. Clearer than my eval and, maybe, also clearer than messing around with __ANON__.

-- 
Ronald Fischer <ynnor@mm.st>