in reply to Re: Time to write a "serious" http server in Perl?
in thread Time to write a "serious" http server in Perl?
Running a proxy in front of mod_perl has long been the recommended configuration.
Firstly, I hate mod_perl; and, I don't use Apache. Though for a long time I used both of them. With that said, mod_perl is not recommended by anyone who uses it and knows of its "alternatives." Again: If you use mod_perl it is not a recommended solution.. It is the *only* solution. There isn't a single non-contrived use case of mod_perl where fastcgi can be used, in which FastCGI shouldn't be used. FastCGI is a platform agnostic way to write web pages with your favorite scripting language. It requires no linking, and offers a clear separation of the web-server logic, and the web site logic. Conversely, mod_perl is a way to write Apache modules in perl.. These are two totally different tasks. Instructing people to write web sites using mod_perl, is akin to instructing them to write gui's in kernel space using frame buffers.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^3: Time to write a "serious" http server in Perl?
by mr_mischief (Monsignor) on Aug 13, 2008 at 19:27 UTC | |
|
Re^3: Time to write a "serious" http server in Perl?
by jdrago_999 (Hermit) on Aug 12, 2008 at 15:37 UTC |