Re: Good Forums?

This place exists because of vroom. Go be vroom for one of those other topics. If there was a useful SQLMonks, I'd be on there as much as I am on here. Same with ProgrammingPracticeMonks, TestingMonks, etc. I'm not stopping you.

My criteria for good software:

Does it work?
Can someone else come in, make a change, and be reasonably certain no bugs were introduced?

Comment on Re: Good Forums?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Good Forums? by pileofrogs (Priest) on Aug 21, 2008 at 19:45 UTC
Okay... uh.. how do I do that? Seriously, how did vroom pull it off? Why does perlmonks succeed where everything else fails? Hmm... This needs to be it's own thread...	[reply]
Re^3: Good Forums? by Gavin (Archbishop) on Aug 21, 2008 at 20:45 UTC
PerlMonks succeeds because of the dedication of a select few and the contributions of many.	[reply]
Re^4: Good Forums? by Erez (Priest) on Aug 22, 2008 at 17:50 UTC
Which is a sentence that can be said about Perl, or CPAN... And isn't it time people realise this is all part of this magic thing called Perl and the people it attracts? Stop saying 'script'. Stop saying 'line-noise'. We have nothing to lose but our metaphors.	[reply]