in reply to Re: DBD::ODBC vs. DBD::Oracle
in thread DBD::ODBC vs. DBD::Oracle

thanks for the advice. I thought it would be nice to use a 64 bit version of Perl because our server is a 64 bit machine. In some cases we are using lots of memory for a single process (creating huge hashes, huge arrays, lists, etc) and we are using a 64 bit version of Oracle. So, if I decide to go with StrawberryPerl, which only supports a 32bit version) will it be easy to install DBD::Oracle?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: DBD::ODBC vs. DBD::Oracle
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Aug 23, 2008 at 10:12 UTC

    If you are on a 64-bit platform, you'll be far better off--performance, memory, support--using a 64-bit build of perl, than restricting yourself to a 32-bit build on the basis of a piece of idealogically motivated FUD from someone who takes pride in declaring that he doesn't use your target platform.


    Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
    "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
    In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
Re^3: DBD::ODBC vs. DBD::Oracle
by tilly (Archbishop) on Aug 23, 2008 at 08:34 UTC
    I can't promise it will be easy, but it is worth a try. With Strawberry Perl you would need to run the command
    perl -MCPAN -e shell
    which will start the CPAN shell. After answering a series of questions you'll need to type in:
    install DBI install DBD::Oracle
    and there is a good chance that it will work. If it doesn't, well, you can install Strawberry Perl in some private location first while you run the experiment. If it fails, just delete the directory. If it succeeds, you can play with it for a while before deciding that that is the direction you want to go.