Re^2: How not to hardcode a package name?

I personally believe that you could use the "code in @INC" feature I mentioned in the very root node of this thread. But then it wouldn't be suitable to only work out a package statement, since it is precisely designed to deal with full modules...

Some (old) posts of mine in which I dealt with the technique:

Re: Loading a Module from a Variable
Re: Using a module more than once
Re: I'd like to have an indication when the interpreter moves to the next file (using Filter-Include)?

--
If you can't understand the incipit, then please check the IPB Campaign.

Comment on Re^2: How not to hardcode a package name? Select or Download Code