in reply to Moderation voting

A month or so ago, I considered a node to be edited to add code tags. I received a private message from one of the janitors politely prompting me to read Help authors to help themselves; don't consider the small stuff.

After doing so, I modified my behavior. I no longer consider nodes which contain excessive <br> tags instead of <code> tags. In these cases, I send a private /msg to the OP to use <code> instead of <br> tags.

Additionally, I now vote to keep this category of nodes considered by other monks.

So, I guess I am one small source for the increase in keep votes.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Moderation voting
by psini (Deacon) on Sep 06, 2008 at 10:36 UTC

    Me too.

    Now I tend to vote for edit only when poor tagging makes a node: (a) totally unreadable or (b) breaking page formatting (at least on my browser).

    Rule One: "Do not act incautiously when confronting a little bald wrinkly smiling man."