So? Likewise linking to a user makes his writeups only one click away, we still have the [by://] shortcut.
Asking the other way: is there any reason not to implement [dep://] or [deps://] some brave soul contributed code and documentation? | [reply]
[d/l]
[select] |
Good question. I don't know how the gods feel about it, but I personally believe that an unrestrained proliferation of shortcut types is not in our best interest; and a request for one from a single user isn't, by itself, sufficient justification for it, precedents not withstanding.
we still have the [by://] shortcut
Yeah.... I would have cast my (moot) vote against that too, probably. (Although it sounds rather hypocritical of me to say that, since I wrote the patch which implemented the [by://] scheme...)
Between the mind which plans and the hands which build, there must be a mediator... and this mediator must be the heart.
| [reply]
[d/l]
[select] |