Re^2: looking towards learning OOP

In my opinion, the "normal way" is always insufficient for anything of greater complexity than "hello, world".

Myth: Moose is an unnecessary dependency

Basically, you can not use Moose... but why? Why pass up on something that makes your application go together more quickly and probably results in more correct code?

Comment on Re^2: looking towards learning OOP

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: looking towards learning OOP by Lawliet (Curate) on Sep 16, 2008 at 00:17 UTC
They would prefer to learn the fundamentals before using something that does it for them. The same reason why some would like to learn HTML before using Dreamweaver. However, there is a line; 'learn how to build a computer from scratch before using it' and so on. I'm so adjective, I verb nouns! chomp; # nom nom nom	[reply]
Re^3: looking towards learning OOP by DrHyde (Prior) on Sep 16, 2008 at 10:27 UTC
If you think the normal way is always insufficient, I have to wonder what you're doing wrong. It certainly works well enough for me. And my colleagues. And the authors of most of the objectish modules I ever use.	[reply]
Re^3: looking towards learning OOP by spx2 (Deacon) on Sep 30, 2008 at 11:58 UTC
because it's documentation is almost ... a joke ?	[reply]