in reply to Re^4: Organizing and presenting a cross-reference
in thread Organizing and presenting a cross-reference
I assure you that this is not the way it works;
Sorry, but this is a subject I know a little about so you'll excuse me if I don't take your word for this. Just because your local autoparts shop has made some attempt at deriving a table of cross-manufacturer equivalences, doesn't mean that they knew what they were doing when the did so. Having been burned (expensively) with just such a "Yeah! That'll do the job" assurance...I'm twice shy!
plugs with different operating parameters get a different part number.
Yes, within any given manufacturers range. But, as the presence of two or more 'equivalent' parts within a single manufacturers range testifies, the ranges can overlap. So, for example, you might have:
Cylinder Temp: low----A--B-------C-------D-----------high ManA plug1 ********** plug2 ************** ManB plug1 ********************* plug2 *********************
For a vehicle requiring C, ManA.plug2 and ManB.plug2 are interchangable.
But using that equivalence to suggest fitting ManA.plug2s to a vehicle D, specified as taking ManB.plug2 could be costly.
This is why all the manufacturers ask for the application in order to recommend the plugs in their range.
You might want to read this, paying particular attention to the last paragraphs on pages 2 and 3.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^6: Organizing and presenting a cross-reference
by oko1 (Deacon) on Sep 24, 2008 at 15:10 UTC | |
by Gavin (Archbishop) on Sep 24, 2008 at 17:40 UTC | |
|