in reply to Is it harmful to spend too long on PerlMonks?

We should all be trying much harder to make PerlMonks crash and burn. It's too big to fail so we'll end up billionaires with a new version if we can only drive it into the ground. Remember it's illegal to short Java.

Or seriously: Having the tabs/windows open doesn't eat up extra resources since there is nothing persistently dynamic going on (unless you have chat clients open which strikes me as pretty rude if you're not actually there). So, don't worry. And being here often is the biggest reason I'm an overpaid successful developer so using the site often is definitely not harmful in that regard. ...Maybe to your rear.

  • Comment on Re: Is it harmful to spend too long on PerlMonks?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Is it harmful to spend too long on PerlMonks?
by jvector (Friar) on Oct 03, 2008 at 17:42 UTC
    We should all be trying much harder to make PerlMonks crash and burn. It's too big to fail so we'll end up billionaires with a new version if we can only drive it into the ground.

    Ah ha! The Windows argument!!

    Remember it's illegal to short Java.

    Ooh.. topical!

    Or seriously: Having the tabs/windows open doesn't eat up extra resources since there is nothing persistently dynamic going on

    Figures. As also implied by JavaFan.

    (unless you have chat clients open which strikes me as pretty rude if you're not actually there).

    I tend only to have the passive CB60 so no harm there.

    Thanks, I shall keep all my many windows and tabs open! (Session Manager says 30/99)

    This signature will be ready by Christmas