Re^3: Generate the perl sequence 1, 11, 111, ....

I want this language!

I know we're not allowed to ask when, so I'll ask if we really will?

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".

In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

Comment on Re^3: Generate the perl sequence 1, 11, 111, ....

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Generate the perl sequence 1, 11, 111, .... by TimToady (Parson) on Oct 10, 2008 at 18:53 UTC
Yes, we really will. We have a complete parser now, written in Perl 6, that parses itself, and can spit out an AST. All that remains is to come up with a VM with sufficent support for lazy functional OO semantics, and write an emitter for it. Simple! `:)`	[reply]
Re^4: Generate the perl sequence 1, 11, 111, .... by xiaoyafeng (Deacon) on Oct 11, 2008 at 17:47 UTC
I know we're not allowed to ask when, so I'll ask if we really will? Xmas of 2010? ;) I am trying to improve my English skills, if you see a mistake please feel free to reply or /msg me a correction	[reply]
Re^5: Generate the perl sequence 1, 11, 111, .... by TimToady (Parson) on Oct 11, 2008 at 18:02 UTC
That's the good news. The bad news is that we'll have to send someone out to Jupiter to fetch it. `:)`	[reply]