Re^2: Just when you thought you'd got it: 'foreach $f (@foo)' vs 'foreach (@foo)'

I personally believe that it would be very, very fussy of me to remind it, but just for completeness, it has to be said that there is a well known bug with localising $_ and tied objects, which -I just tested- is still there in 5.10.0 (while I had hoped for it to have been solved...) But then of course one has not to worry unless she's using tied objects...

--
If you can't understand the incipit, then please check the IPB Campaign.

Comment on Re^2: Just when you thought you'd got it: 'foreach $f (@foo)' vs 'foreach (@foo)' Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Just when you thought you'd got it: 'foreach $f (@foo)' vs 'foreach (@foo)' by ikegami (Patriarch) on Oct 16, 2008 at 13:49 UTC
Worse. There are two bugs associated with `local $var` and neither is specific to `$_`. I wrote about them.	[reply] [d/l] [select]