I don't think I've seen one based on this mechanic:
s..//s:sy/:/ssy/ss::y:/ss:y:/:ssy/s://y:s///;////:ys:::/;///:sy/s://y: +s///y/::s/y/://:;s///:y/:/s/y//:::y://s:y:/::/y:://:;///:/y/://sy//:/ +/y/:/s:y:s//:ys/:::y/:s::;///s:y/:s//y:s///y//s::y:/:/:y:/::/;///:sy/ +/s:/y/:///y/:s::y:/:ss.;y,y/:s;,|01./,;$/=$_;map{$;=(sprintf'%05b',$_ +);print+chr((eval'0b'.join'',map{eval'$;=~m/('.(split?/?,$/)[$_].')/? +1:0'}0..6)+32)}1..25
any tips to golf it down a bit, while maintaining reasonable obfuscation?