Are you being deliberately thick? If you don't read what we write and can't be bothered to answer the questions or respond to the suggestions we propose, how do you expect to get any answer that is of benefit to you?

Let me reiterate:

1. The code you posted can not run - it is syntactically incorrect.
2. We don't want 64K of data. We want about 20 characters of data to exercise the code.
3. The input data you describe is not the input data that the code you supplied parses (even if it could run).
4. Learn to use paragraph tags to break your text up into chunks that can be parsed as a unit and that express a single idea or point of reply.

Update it is conventional here to note substantive updates to your nodes with an update section (like this one). For those who came in late, the node to which this is a reply has been updated and the original node in this thread has been updated.

Due to the excessive data you have provided in Out of memory. FireFox does not render it in a usable fashion for me. If there is any sample data of sensible size provided in that node I can not see it.