Re^2: Getopt::Euclid, strange behavior & how to fix?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Getopt::Euclid, strange behavior & how to fix? by JavaFan (Canon) on Nov 05, 2008 at 15:54 UTC
I guess you mean that some ideas of Getopt::Euclid are really nice, as you don't like some other ideas of Getopt::Euclid. ;-)	[reply]
Re^4: Getopt::Euclid, strange behavior & how to fix? by pht (Acolyte) on Nov 05, 2008 at 17:13 UTC
Nah. I initially thought I did something wrong. But even if that's the way it's supposed to work, I guess I'm still going to like it. On the other hand, I'd really like to know why the missing argument thing is not considered a bug, if someone cares to explain :-)	[reply]
Re^5: Getopt::Euclid, strange behavior & how to fix? by Anonymous Monk on Nov 06, 2008 at 10:23 UTC
Because a filename can be practically anything, even -foo-bar	[reply]