in reply to Re^5: using many threads and conserving stack size
in thread using many threads and conserving stack size
yes, that makes sense. Awwww, now I have thread-guilt!
What doesn't make sense is that if you detach a thread, it gets stomped on when the main thread ends. AFAIK there is no way to say "I don't care what value it returns, but I DO want it to actually get there".
Guess I just want it all ...
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^7: using many threads and conserving stack size
by gone2015 (Deacon) on Nov 12, 2008 at 17:08 UTC | |
by Zen (Deacon) on Nov 12, 2008 at 23:05 UTC |