Re^4: Email::Send::Gmail with Cygwin

I get a similar error with Strawberry perl:

...
Warning: Prerequisite 'Net::SMTP::SSL => 0' for 'LBROCARD/Email-Send-G
+mail-0.33.
tar.gz' failed when processing 'CWEST/Net-SMTP-SSL-1.01.tar.gz' with '
+make_test
=> NO'. Continuing, but chances to succeed are limited.
cp lib/Email/Send/Gmail.pm blib\lib\Email\Send\Gmail.pm
  LBROCARD/Email-Send-Gmail-0.33.tar.gz
  C:\strawberry\c\bin\dmake.EXE -- OK
Running make test
C:\strawberry\perl\bin\perl.exe "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_h
+arness(0,
'blib\lib', 'blib\arch')" t/*.t
t/pod....skipped: Test::Pod 1.14 required for testing POD: Can't locat
+e Test/Pod
.pm in @INC (@INC contains: C:\strawberry\cpan\build\Email-Send-Gmail-
+0.33-gadhk
d\blib\lib C:\strawberry\cpan\build\Email-Send-Gmail-0.33-gadhkd\blib\
+arch C:\st
rawberry\cpan\build\Email-Send-Gmail-0.33-gadhkd\blib\lib C:\strawberr
+y\cpan\bui
ld\Email-Send-Gmail-0.33-gadhkd\blib\arch C:/STRAWB~1/perl/lib C:/STRA
+WB~1/perl/
site/lib) at (eval 3) line 2.
Files=1, Tests=0,  0 wallclock secs ( 0.05 usr +  0.00 sys =  0.05 CPU
+)
Result: NOTESTS
  LBROCARD/Email-Send-Gmail-0.33.tar.gz
Tests succeeded but one dependency not OK (Net::SMTP::SSL)
  LBROCARD/Email-Send-Gmail-0.33.tar.gz
  [dependencies] -- NA
Running make install
  make test had returned bad status, won't install without force
[download]

Can anyone try installing this package on their system? I'm getting the impression it's just broken.

Comment on Re^4: Email::Send::Gmail with Cygwin Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Email::Send::Gmail with Cygwin by fmerges (Chaplain) on Nov 20, 2008 at 12:59 UTC
Hi, `cpan[3]> install Email::Send::Gmail Email::Send::Gmail is up to date (0.33).` [download] I think you have problem maybe with another components, as the anonymous monk said check if SSLey is giving you a problem... Regards, fmerges at irc.freenode.net	[reply] [d/l]
Re^5: Email::Send::Gmail with Cygwin by Anonymous Monk on Nov 20, 2008 at 08:05 UTC
Can anyone try installing this package on their system? I'm getting the impression it's just broken. I can see why, but that is not the case. http://search.cpan.org/dist/Net-SSLeay/ PASS (320) FAIL (43) UNKNOWN (6)	[reply]