in reply to Re^5: Reference of constants and literals
in thread Reference of constants and literals
( Ignore this post. It's subjective and/or unclear, and it doesn't add anything to the conversation. )
and since nothing is refering to $x, that one goes out of scope as well. There is never a time when there's nothing referring to $x. f's pad refers to $x even when f is not being executed.
|
|---|