Re^8: Perl Vs Ruby

> (and tie is an annoying hack)

Isn't it ironic that your so in favour of OOP and in the same time reject tie, which is essentially nothing more than a pimped up bless?

It's reliable, you can hide it behind syntactic sugar, BUT it's as slow as the rest of Perl OO.

But hey, wait! Didn't you just explain that slowness doesn't matter ...??? ; )

Cheers Rolf

PS: Thx for the insights in Ruby, I agree about some syntactic annoyances in Perl 5, and I'd really love to have Perl 6 syntax right now mapped on Perl 5 semantics and interpreter... sigh! : (

Comment on Re^8: Perl Vs Ruby

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^9: Perl Vs Ruby by Joost (Canon) on Nov 26, 2008 at 23:22 UTC
The slowness isn't an issue, the fact that it doesn't integrate AT ALL with the "normal" OO interfaces really is. See also Re^9: Perl Vs Ruby "What should it profit a man, if he should win a flame war, yet lose his cool?"	[reply]