Re: Allowed HTML tags

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Allowed HTML tags by ambrus (Abbot) on Nov 27, 2008 at 10:32 UTC
Definitely not "q", because "q" is a real html tag that's currently not allowed but only because the gods think it has poor browser support, so it might be reenabled again when everyone uses browsers that support even all the new HTML 5 tags.	[reply]
Re^3: Allowed HTML tags by JavaFan (Canon) on Nov 27, 2008 at 11:42 UTC
Well, `<code>` is a real HTML tag as well, and that didn't stop perlmonks from turning it into something different.	[reply]
Re^4: Allowed HTML tags by ww (Archbishop) on Nov 27, 2008 at 11:57 UTC
In this case, I'd say "improved it" rather than "turning it into something different." Seems that the w3c 4.01 spec effectively requires a preceding <pre> to achieve what The Monastery does with a simple <code>...</code> or <c>...</c> See w3c or http://www.htmlhelp.com/reference/html40/phrase/code.html.	[reply]
Re^5: Allowed HTML tags by JavaFan (Canon) on Nov 27, 2008 at 12:10 UTC
Re^6: Allowed HTML tags by ambrus (Abbot) on Nov 27, 2008 at 19:37 UTC
Re^6: Allowed HTML tags by belg4mit (Prior) on Nov 28, 2008 at 19:39 UTC
Some notes below your chosen depth have not been shown here
Re^6: Allowed HTML tags by Anonymous Monk on Nov 27, 2008 at 18:41 UTC
Re^5: Allowed HTML tags by Anonymous Monk on Sep 27, 2013 at 05:47 UTC
Re^2: Allowed HTML tags by Lawliet (Curate) on Nov 27, 2008 at 20:28 UTC
I second this motion. It gets annoying to keep typing the whole word. I'm so adjective, I verb nouns! chomp; # nom nom nom	[reply]