in reply to Re^12: does threads (still) memleak?
in thread does threads (still) memleak?
Sorry, but I would have to say that the first version of the output you've posted above is impossible. It suggests that you have managed to create a hash with duplicate keys--and that is impossible!
You're going to have to post the code that you're using, along with the versions of Perl/threads/threads::shared. Nether version of the 'corrected' code I posted could ever produce that first output barring some catastrophic corruption.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^14: does threads (still) memleak?
by faxm0dem (Novice) on Nov 28, 2008 at 13:53 UTC | |
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Nov 28, 2008 at 14:09 UTC | |
by faxm0dem (Novice) on Nov 28, 2008 at 14:40 UTC | |
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Nov 28, 2008 at 15:07 UTC | |
by faxm0dem (Novice) on Nov 28, 2008 at 15:30 UTC | |
| |
by faxm0dem (Novice) on Nov 28, 2008 at 15:01 UTC | |
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Nov 28, 2008 at 15:30 UTC |