in reply to Re^6: Sharing sockets between the main script and thread
in thread Sharing sockets between the main script and thread

All of which is completely irrelevant as I'm only referring to the mechanism of transferring handles from one thread to another. Still, I've noticed that there is a propensity for some people to prefer complicated to simple.


Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
"Too many [] have been sedated by an oppressive environment of political correctness and risk aversion."
  • Comment on Re^7: Sharing sockets between the main script and thread

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^8: Sharing sockets between the main script and thread
by markseger (Beadle) on Nov 30, 2008 at 17:14 UTC
    re complexity - no disagreement and I'm always looking for easier ways to do things. I really like the mechanism for sharing file handles via the file number and it does indeed work like a champ for me. The only challenge I had was to take the traditional socket model which tends to have worker threads doing the I/O and turn it on its head because I need a different model, at least I think I do.

    -mark