in reply to Re^2: Dynamically named hashes (w or w/o strict)
in thread Dynamically named hashes (w or w/o strict)
One thing is for sure, until you explain to us why you are "trying to create a set of dynamically named hashes, with an array of references pointing to them" we will probably miss your point. :)
Is there some reason why an anonymous hash won't do exactly what you need without having to have an additional array? After all, you can always create a dynamic list of the hashes keys and values whenever you want.
jeffa
L-LL-L--L-LL-L--L-LL-L-- -R--R-RR-R--R-RR-R--R-RR B--B--B--B--B--B--B--B-- H---H---H---H---H---H--- (the triplet paradiddle with high-hat)
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^4: Dynamically named hashes (w or w/o strict)
by chrishowe (Acolyte) on Dec 11, 2008 at 15:37 UTC | |
by Porculus (Hermit) on Dec 11, 2008 at 22:15 UTC |