in reply to tree (Unix program)

Hi,
nice one, anon++ (you should have published this with your monk name for some well deseved XP ;-) )
Two things come to my mind:
  • it doesn't compile with use strict;
  • there is no usage message or POD that describes the parameters
    Regards,
    svenXY
  • Replies are listed 'Best First'.
    Re^2: tree (Unix program)
    by Bloodnok (Vicar) on Dec 16, 2008 at 12:22 UTC
      Agreed svenXY...also, in general, the layout ...
      • preparation
      • sub call
      • sub definition
      • wrap up
      seems a little odd to me

      A user level that continues to overstate my experience :-))