Re^6: the "our" declaration ?!!

with curlies, no nesting:

use strict;

no warnings;


#no strict "vars";  # option1
our $x;        # option2

{
    package one;
    $x="one";
    print $x;
}

{
    package two;
    print $x;
}

__END__
1: one
2: oneone
[download]

I know that "use warnings" produces to "Use of uninitialized value" for option 1, but that's not the point here.

Cheers Rolf

Comment on Re^6: the "our" declaration ?!! Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^7: the "our" declaration ?!! by ikegami (Patriarch) on Jan 20, 2009 at 22:51 UTC
You're forgetting about `main`, where the `our` is located	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^8: the "our" declaration ?!! by LanX (Saint) on Jan 20, 2009 at 23:47 UTC
But we are talking about refactoring "no strict vars" into "our", IMHO most people would place "no strict vars" into the top scope, if there are multiple packages... your rule of a thumb is over-simplified, and is not getting better with additional side-rules for curlies and forbidden nesting...	[reply]
Re^9: the "our" declaration ?!! by ikegami (Patriarch) on Jan 21, 2009 at 01:36 UTC
Having to counter "It doesn't work if I do something else I shouldn't" is not adding rules or over simplifying. Since proper encapsulation is the basis of programming, I didn't add any rules.	[reply]