in reply to Revisiting the old clichés of programming languages
Personally, I conclude that “clichés are just that ... clichés.” They're vast oversimplifications, good for baiting the occasional “troll” but frankly not worth the time of day. (C'mon, how many times has any statement featuring the word “all,” really turned out to be worthwhile?)
We are lucky to be a part of a hair-pulling profession that changes sometimes by the month. Technologies that spring to life with much fanfare (and many O'Reilly books...) are sometimes “dead” within a year.
(Of course, those “dead” artifacts are now in production and will have to be maintained ... forever.)
I do believe, therefore, that it is very significant that “Perl is still here.” Since we typically don't have a huge marketing-engine selling “a piping hot cup of Perl” :-D to the bigwigs in the ivory tower, this demand must be coming from the field, where “the soldiers themselves” are fighting the battles, and, to the extent that they can, are choosing their weapons. It must be they, and their field-commanders, who are choosing Perl ... and who keep choosing it.
I think that distinction is hugely important. “Don't watch what people say. Watch what they do.” If you observe any tool that has been in-use for more than ten years, and that still attracts the attention and dedication (and the volunteered time) of a very large group of professional programmers, pay attention to that tool. Perl is one.
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^2: Revisiting the old clichés of programming languages
by fullermd (Vicar) on Jan 27, 2009 at 09:48 UTC | |
by locked_user sundialsvc4 (Abbot) on Jan 27, 2009 at 14:01 UTC | |
by fullermd (Vicar) on Jan 27, 2009 at 15:36 UTC | |
|
Re^2: Revisiting the old clichés of programming languages
by holli (Abbot) on Jan 27, 2009 at 01:29 UTC |