in reply to IPC Messages Redux

I don't want it to be so strict that I have to pre-code every possible interaction,

If any part of the users input can be passed to a shell or otherwise be executed without rigorous validation, you open chinks through which the bad guys may squeeze.

And rigorous validation of all possible interactions is going to be far harder than encoding (say) a dispatch table of all allowed interactions.


Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
"Too many [] have been sedated by an oppressive environment of political correctness and risk aversion."

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: IPC Messages Redux
by pileofrogs (Priest) on Feb 02, 2009 at 18:32 UTC

    Yes, I totally agree. I'm just a lousy question-writer and I said what I said badly.