Also, if you know the function names beforehand, there is no need to use AUTOLOAD. For simple object accessors, there is Class::Accessor and for others stuff you can do it like this:

#!perl -w
use strict;

sub gen_func {
    my ($package,$name,$code) = @_;
    no strict 'refs';
    *{"$package\::$name"} = $code;
};

sub gen_printer {
    my ($package,$name) = @_;
    gen_func( $package, $name, sub { print "Hello $name\n" });
};

gen_printer(__PACKAGE__, 'ree');

ree();
[download]

If they are all completely different: no.

The problem with autoload is that it can hide misspelled methods. It can be hard to debug a program when you have calls that work, but the end result is different than what you expect.

# Example:

$self->callab1e( $value ); #vs.
$self->callable( $value );
# Problem is ^. 

# A transcribed 'one' in place of an L. You 
# might never notice if your editor uses the 
# wrong font.
[download]

I am not saying you should manually write 50 functions, but you should not blindly use autoload without understanding its short-comings.