merlyn, Thanks for clarifying. I was hesitant to say "equivalent"; even to say anything other than "you can shorten your code..." And now I've reread the doc, a Good Thing.

I've reread the OP too, and I think the claimed output is misleading. Surely it is more like the following? (In which case my suggestion can be stricken, as it would only yield the files.)

/path/to/File 1
/path/to/File 10
/path/to/File 100
/path/to/File 2
/path/to/File 20
...
[download]

Whew.