in reply to CGI.pm HTML shortcuts

Hi. Personally I use the tags within the perl code I write. This is because of the fact that most of the time I'm writing perl I'm using it for my personal use, but I also write Cold Fusion / ASP code. Cold fusion code is basically html tags with cold fusion extension tags that are based on html tags. ASP, on the other hand, is still HTML but with a different application infrastructure (if you can call it that) underneth, a mix of html and custom tags and optional vb-type code. Therefore, I am comfortable writing the tags within my perl code because it allows me to change languages quickly. Of course, I only use perl when I actually have a chance to write web code for myself. (Though I will be looking at php at some point because it does have some perl-ish features and it's similar to cf/asp, though, imho, it doesn't have the openess that perl supports.)
Zak

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: CGI.pm HTML shortcuts
by murphya (Sexton) on Apr 21, 2001 at 18:50 UTC
    Why not use CGI.pm? It is easy, clean and quick. Additionally, even with standards changing pretty quickly, you don't have to worry about altering all of the code by hand - just update the module. It also forces you (with no work on your part) to use the latest methods.

    The best place to learn about it is via the perl.com website - see the "How do I write CGI?" link.