in reply to Re^2: threads on Windows
in thread threads on Windows
Hmmm... that's odd. I found that the close STDIN did the job perfectly. I note you are using ActiveState perl v5.8.8 on a dual core machine -- while I have 5.10.0, single core... but have no way of knowing whether either accounts for the difference.
Just in case: it's not necessary to have the sleep in the input thread and the close together... the close on its own does the trick (here).
I wondered whether it made a difference if the input thread was blocked on the <STDIN> at the time the main thread did the close STDIN in the main thread to block or fail... which would be more likely on a dual core machine. However, I tried a threads->yield() before the close, and that didn't make any difference. (The input loop was definitely waiting for <STDIN> but the close completed successfully.)I suppose this could be different on 5.8.8 ?
If you wanted to play with semaphores you could do:
which guarantees that the main thread has closed STDIN before the input thread touches it.# Create terminal watcher print "Create terminal watcher...\n"; my $Q_stdin = Thread::Queue->new ; my $S_stdin = Thread::Semaphore->new(0) ; print "fileno(STDIN) = ", fileno(STDIN), "\n" ; async { $S_stdin->down() ; print "Reading STDIN, fileno=", fileno(STDIN), "\n" ; while (defined( $_ = <STDIN> )) { chomp ; print "\n+IN : '$_' " ; $Q_stdin->enqueue( $_ ) ; print "*" ; } ; }->detach; close STDIN ; ### no longer our business + <<<< print "STDIN is: ", defined(fileno(STDIN)) ? 'open' : 'closed', "\n" ; $S_stdin->up() ;
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^4: threads on Windows
by kennethk (Abbot) on Feb 12, 2009 at 17:33 UTC |