Re^2: On collaboration between projects

Seriously, I don't see Moose emerging as "the one best fit for most people" more than the Inside-Out fad, that Moose supplanted.

Comment on Re^2: On collaboration between projects

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: On collaboration between projects by tirwhan (Abbot) on Feb 19, 2009 at 09:28 UTC
Which just serves to emphasise my point, it is a good thing that multiple solutions exist :-). From what I've seen, many people looking for a "more modern" Perl OO system seem to settle on Moose these days, and it seems to be getting to the stage where s/many/most/. But if you think there's a better alternative out there (out of interest, which would that be, btw?), then clearly it is a good thing that these alternatives exist. All dogma is stupid.	[reply] [d/l]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^3: On collaboration between projects
by tirwhan (Abbot) on Feb 19, 2009 at 09:28 UTC

Which just serves to emphasise my point, it is a good thing that multiple solutions exist :-). From what I've seen, many people looking for a "more modern" Perl OO system seem to settle on Moose these days, and it seems to be getting to the stage where s/many/most/. But if you think there's a better alternative out there (out of interest, which would that be, btw?), then clearly it is a good thing that these alternatives exist.

All dogma is stupid.

[reply]
[d/l]