in reply to Re: Fastest way to grep multiple time on some array
in thread Fastest way to grep multiple time on some array

It doesn't quite work. grep_and_remove() should do the trick:
use warnings; use strict; use Data::Dumper; sub grep_in_place(&@) { my ($cb, $array) = @_; my $src = -1; my $dst = -1; while (++$src < @$array) { my $keep; $keep = $cb->() for $array->[$src]; $array->[++$dst] = $array->[$src]; } $#$array = $dst; } sub grep_and_remove (&\@) { my ($cb, $array_ref) = @_; my @found; my $i = 0; GREP: while ($i < @{ $array_ref }) { $cb->() and push(@found, splice(@{ $array_ref }, $i, 1)) and next GREP for $array_ref->[$i]; ++$i; } return @found; } my @arr1 = (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8); my @arr2 = grep_in_place { $_ > 4 } @arr1; my @arr3 = (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8); my @arr4 = grep_and_remove { $_ > 4 } @arr3; print Dumper(\@arr1, \@arr2, \@arr3, \@arr4); __END__ $VAR1 = [ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ]; $VAR2 = [ '-1' ]; $VAR3 = [ 1, 2, 3, 4 ]; $VAR4 = [ 5, 6, 7, 8 ];

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Fastest way to grep multiple time on some array
by ikegami (Patriarch) on Feb 19, 2009 at 23:57 UTC

    You used it wrong, but I see I used the wrong prototype, and my "if $keep" disappeared.

    use strict; use warnings; sub grep_in_place(&\@) { my ($cb, $array) = @_; my $src = -1; my $dst = -1; while (++$src < @$array) { my $keep; $keep = $cb->() for $array->[$src]; $array->[++$dst] = $array->[$src] if $keep; } $#$array = $dst; } my @a = (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8); print("Before: @a\n"); grep_in_place { $_ > 4 } @a; print("After: @a\n");
    Before: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 After: 5 6 7 8

    To get your (and probably the OP's) semantics:

    sub grep_and_remove(&\@) { my ($cb, $array) = @_; my $src = -1; my $dst = -1; my @deleted; while (++$src < @$array) { my $keep; $keep = $cb->() for $array->[$src]; ($keep ? $deleted[@deleted] : $array->[++$dst] ) = $array->[$src]; } $#$array = $dst; return @deleted; } my @a = (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8); print("Before: @a\n"); my @b = grep_and_remove { $_ > 4 } @a; print("After: @a\n"); print("Returned: @b\n");
    Before: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 After: 1 2 3 4 Returned: 5 6 7 8

    No crazy splice!

      Thanks for the clarification and the better way! :)