Re: Object Oriented Perfomance

It would help if you told him the name of the book before attacking him for not buying it. Maybe he's never heard of the book, which sounds like a good reason to ask up here.

This proves not to be the case.

He's well aware of the book in question. Check the small italic section at the end of the post. What I took issue with was that he seemed aghast at the notion of paying for information, especially when the book explicitly covers all of his concerns.

xoxo,
Andy

# Andy Lester  http://www.petdance.com  AIM:petdance
%_=split';','.; Perl ;@;st a;m;ker;p;not;o;hac;t;her;y;ju';
print map $_{$_}, split //,
'andy@petdance.com'

Comment on Re: Object Oriented Perfomance

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Object Oriented Perfomance by elwarren (Priest) on Apr 23, 2001 at 21:52 UTC
A thousand pardons petdance, you are absolutely correct. I completely mistook the negative size two font comment at the end for a signature. Impossible to read on this monitor. Having not read PerlMonks all weekend, I was trying to skim as many posts as possible. Serves me right.	[reply]