Re: Is Wikipedia afraid of MojoMojo?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Is Wikipedia afraid of MojoMojo? by CountZero (Bishop) on Mar 02, 2009 at 07:23 UTC
No. This is called final protective fire and a well used and accepted technique. Even the Wikipedia lists it, so it must be notable! CountZero A program should be light and agile, its subroutines connected like a string of pearls. The spirit and intent of the program should be retained throughout. There should be neither too little or too much, neither needless loops nor useless variables, neither lack of structure nor overwhelming rigidity." - The Tao of Programming, 4.1 - Geoffrey James	[reply]
Re^2: Is Wikipedia afraid of MojoMojo? by ForgotPasswordAgain (Vicar) on Mar 02, 2009 at 09:10 UTC
I wish. It's this kind of melodrama that turned me off from Catalyst for a long time. No idea how this is considered "Perl News"..	[reply]
Re^3: Is Wikipedia afraid of MojoMojo? by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Mar 06, 2009 at 03:13 UTC
I wish. It's this kind of melodrama that turned me off from Catalyst for a long time. citation needed Who will cite the citers? The inciters, that's who.	[reply]