clinton has asked for the wisdom of the Perl Monks concerning the following question:
Hi all
Is this a bug, or just a bad regex?
sub match { no warnings; my $value = shift @_; $value =~ s{^(?:aa(bb))?.*}{$1}i; return $value; } sub match_warn { use warnings; my $value = shift @_; $value =~ s{^(?:aa(bb))?.*}{$1}i; return $value; } print match('aabbcc')."\n"; # 'bb' print match('abbcc')."\n"; # '' print match_warn('aabbcc')."\n"; # 'bb' print match_warn('abbcc')."\n"; # Use of uninitialized value $1 +in substitution iterator
The way I would have read that is that the capture would contain the empty string, rather than undef and so wouldn't have thrown an unintialized value warning. Is my assumption correct, which would mean that this is a bug (in 5.8.8 and 5.10), or is there a better way to write this regex.
(Note: this regex is a simplified example of a substitution which is intended to retain a part of a string (if the surrounding text matches), and if not, to set the string to the empty string).
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re: Bug? Use of uninitialized value $1 in substitution iterator
by moritz (Cardinal) on Mar 04, 2009 at 12:55 UTC | |
by clinton (Priest) on Mar 04, 2009 at 13:00 UTC | |
Re: Bug? Use of uninitialized value $1 in substitution iterator
by bellaire (Hermit) on Mar 04, 2009 at 13:01 UTC | |
Re: Bug? Use of uninitialized value $1 in substitution iterator
by ikegami (Patriarch) on Mar 04, 2009 at 15:28 UTC | |
by clinton (Priest) on Mar 04, 2009 at 18:29 UTC |