Re^2: Is Wikipedia afraid of MojoMojo?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Is Wikipedia afraid of MojoMojo? by chromatic (Archbishop) on Mar 05, 2009 at 19:37 UTC
R. I. P. MojoMojo Long live craptastic wiki software. Drama much?	[reply]
Re^4: Is Wikipedia afraid of MojoMojo? by Lawliet (Curate) on Mar 05, 2009 at 20:51 UTC
Sure makes the node more interesting :P And you didn't even know bears could type.	[reply]
Wikipedia is failing by jayk806 (Initiate) on Mar 05, 2009 at 17:24 UTC
As a previous poster said, Wikipedia is often unfair and the quality of it's content suffers because of it. The MojoMojo drama has confirmed for me what I already suspected... and that is that Wikipedia does not deserve the reputation it has as a source of reliable / impartial information. The only things we can do are a) inform others and/or b) prepare a better replacement. This article describes exactly this issue, for those interested.	[reply]
Re^4: Wikipedia is failing (Was: Is Wikipedia afraid of MojoMojo?) by ikegami (Patriarch) on Mar 05, 2009 at 17:32 UTC
No one source is reliable or impartial. Wikipedia is a good starting point for research, but it's not some magical oracle.	[reply]

UPDATE