in reply to A non-voteable, user-updateable node?

So.... Not a single member of the Cabal has any thoughts whatsoever on this proposal?

Not to mention that none of the gods have seen fit to change the node's type as requested. Without comment.

Sometimes I feel like I'm the only one around here who gives a flip about improving the Monastery. It's not a good feeling.

Update: Don't get me wrong. It's not that I think the ideas in this thread are important. It doesn't matter much to me whether it happens or not. I'm really commenting here on the apparently asymptotical interest in PerlMonks.

Between the mind which plans and the hands which build, there must be a mediator... and this mediator must be the heart.
  • Comment on Re: A non-voteable, user-updateable node?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: A non-voteable, user-updateable node?
by Lawliet (Curate) on Mar 11, 2009 at 19:27 UTC

    I give a flip above improving the Monastery too, I just have no power to do so. :)

    And you didn't even know bears could type.

[reply]

In Section Inner Scriptorium